Errors During Construction Document Review

Incomplete or Incorrect Information

One of the most common errors in document reviews is incomplete or incorrect information. Missing details, outdated specifications, and inaccurate dimensions can all lead to costly mistakes and delays. That’s why it is essential to review each document carefully, cross-reference multiple sources, and consult with other team members to ensure all that information is accurate and up-to-date.

Formatting Errors

Formatting errors are another common issue in document reviews. Inconsistent fonts, font sizes, line weights, and other formatting elements can make it difficult to read and understand the document, leading to errors in construction or fabrication. To avoid this error, establish consistent formatting standards for all project documents, including font size, line size, as well as specifying formatting rules for tables, figures, and other visual elements. By ensuring that all documents adhere to these standards, you can reduce the risks of misinterpretation and ensure that all team members are on the same page.

Lack of Clarity

A lack of clarity or ambiguity in the document can also be a common error in document reviews. This can occur when the language used in the document is unclear, confusing, or open to interpretation. For example, a specification may not provide clear guidance on the required level of finish for a particular material or surface. To avoid this, it is important to to ensure that all language in the document is clear and unambiguous. This may require rephrasing certain sentences or adding additional clarification in the document. By doing so, you can reduce the risk of misinterpretation, and ensure that all team members are working towards the same goals.


Inconsistencies in the document can also be a common error in document reviews. This can occur when important information or details are missing from the document, or when there are conflicting or inconsistent details within the document. For example, a drawing may show a different dimension than the corresponding specification. It is important to carefully review the document for completeness and consistency. This may require comparing different versions of the document or cross-referencing multiple documents to ensure that all information is complete and consistent. By doing so, you can catch any discrepancies early on in the review process and ensure that all team members are working with the same information.

Collaboration with Different Stakeholders

Collaboration with stakeholders is absolutely essential in construction document reviews. There are lots of collaborators ranging from the owners of the project all the way to contractors, architects, and regulators. Effective communication and collaboration among these stakeholders is essential to ensure that the construction documents accurately reflect the owner’s requirements, comply with codes and regulations, as well as being feasible to construct. By working together efficiently and effectively, having stakeholders work together on construction document ensures success of a project

AEC document reviews
Utilize zipBoard to easily collaborate with other stakeholders


In conclusion, document reviews are an essential part of the AEC industry, and avoiding common errors is essential for success. By following best practices for construction document reviews, maintaining clear communication, and investing in training and development, you can help to ensure that your projects are successful and meet the highest standards of quality and safety.


Author’s Bio:

Griffon is a Associate Product Marketing Manager at zipBoard. He started his marketing journey alongside his BA in Economics at the University of British Columbia. If he is not clicking away at his keyboard, he spends her day reading books or picking up a new series to watch.

Related Post


Follow Us:

©️ Copyright 2023 zipBoard Tech. All rights reserved.