Featured
Our new update brings the Kanban view and a content manager, along with some UI changes. All of this makes managing content on zipBoard a lot more streamlined!
One of the biggest challenges in the AEC industry is the fragmentation of project information across multiple tools. Construction professionals constantly juggle project data, documents, and communication across platforms, leading to inefficiencies, outdated information, and costly errors. At zipBoard, we understand that Procore is the go-to platform for construction project management, but document reviews can
Why Content Review & Issue Tracking Matter eLearning content development is a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, including project managers, instructional designers, developers, subject matter experts (SMEs), and reviewers. However, without a structured content review and issue tracking process, teams often struggle with fragmented feedback, version control issues, and inefficient tracking of project files and
Improved Visibility into Review Processes Managing documents, content, and digital assets effectively is a crucial part of any review process. However, keeping track of who has provided feedback, who is yet to respond, and whether all stakeholders have reviewed an asset before final approval can be challenging. To make this process easier, zipBoard has enhanced
Over 2.5 trillion PDFs are created annually, making them one of the most widely used file formats in professional settings. PDFs remain the industry standard due to their format preservation, security, and universal compatibility. This makes them the preferred choice for sharing important documents with multiple stakeholders. Owing to this, seamless PDF collaboration is essential
Whether for reviewing contracts, marking up blueprints, providing creative feedback, or simply making notes on reports, drawing on a PDF is essential for professionals across industries. Traditionally, this process involved printing documents, marking them up by hand, and scanning them back—an inefficient and time-consuming workflow. While tools like Adobe Acrobat offer markup features, many users
Design reviews play a crucial role in ensuring the quality, efficiency, and success of any creative or product development process. Whether you’re working on eLearning courses, website designs, marketing assets, or other digital content like architectural or engineering drawings, an effective design review process helps teams align on objectives, spot inconsistencies, and implement feedback efficiently.
Effective design review ensures high-quality outputs, whether in web design, product development, eLearning, or construction. However, traditional review processes—filled with endless email threads, scattered feedback, and version control issues—can slow your team down. Modernizing design reviews with the right design review software streamlines collaboration, centralizes feedback, and eliminates inefficiencies. Instead of chasing approvals or deciphering
Collaborate with Clients & External Stakeholders More Effectively Managing internal and external reviews can get messy. Your team needs full control over what clients see and do—without losing efficiency. Until now, client sharing in zipBoard has worked, but many of you have asked for more control, flexibility, and a way to keep internal and external
Effective blueprint management is important for architects, engineers, and contractors to ensure seamless collaboration, minimize errors, and maintain accurate version control of construction drawings. However, traditional blueprint management methods often fall short, creating significant challenges for AEC teams. These challenges range from version control issues and fragmented communication to slow feedback cycles, leading to project
Construction document errors can lead to project delays, costly rework, budget overruns, and safety risks. Due to the complex nature of construction projects, even small mistakes in construction documents like design plans, specifications, or submittals can create a domino effect that disrupts workflows, causes miscommunication, and leads to significant financial and operational setbacks. These errors